With the recent Arab protests over an anti-Islam film, I’m
weighing the critical aspects of this. The protests were bloody at times, and
fed an assault by Islamic fighters on the American consulate in Benghazi, Libya last week that killed four
americans including the first ambassador killed in service since 1979, another
time of severe unrest and Arab uprising. In a familiar message, insulting the
prophet must be met with public outcry, and that translates into, "lets kill
americans".
Slain Ambassador Christopher Stevens and a photo of the burning consulate buildings during the battle-ap photo
In an article in the Denver post, ap writer Brian
Murphy quotes an Imam in Qatar, Egyptian-born
cleric Youssef al-Qaradawi, who calls for ‘sense and reason ‘ in their
protests. But he’s up against a powerful popular force that feels passionately
that denigration of the prophet is punishable by death.
"Yes, we understand
the First Amendment and all of this stuff," wrote Khalid Amayreh, a
prominent Islamist commentator and blogger in Hebron on the West Bank. "But you must also understand that the
Prophet (for us) is a million times more sacred than the American
Constitution."
Read more: Muslim protests have political, social, economic origins - The Denver Post http://www.denverpost.com/nationworld/ci_21558392/muslim-protests-have-political-social-economic-origins?source=pkg#ixzz26jG8wzHe
Read The Denver Post's Terms of Use of its content: http://www.denverpost.com/termsofuse
Read more: Muslim protests have political, social, economic origins - The Denver Post http://www.denverpost.com/nationworld/ci_21558392/muslim-protests-have-political-social-economic-origins?source=pkg#ixzz26jG8wzHe
Read The Denver Post's Terms of Use of its content: http://www.denverpost.com/termsofuse
I have never thought of our constitution as a secular
document. It is written with the spirit of God, and written by men dedicated to
God and to passing His word on to their countrymen. Our forefathers’ ambition was to create a
country where one’s religion was not attacked, no matter what religion it was,
though they hoped all would have some kind of strong religious convictions.
Yes, even then it was a balancing act to not let organized religion overpower
the people’s government in its decisions and such.
In its essence, the Constitution they created says that all men, being
equal, must account for their individual actions as well, and be responsible
for propelling our country into a prosperous nation. The doctrine of Islam, as interpreted by
extremists, is a much different assessment of human character and it’s need for
guidance.
I feel uncomfortable, and at times mental anguish when
subjects, such as Jesus Christ are portrayed in a denigrating way. I oppose
those who slander or seek to diminish Christ and his teachings, but nowhere in
the bible does it say to “humiliate and punish those who do not succumb to and
voluntarily accept” His religion. Therefore, like most Americans, I walk away
when someone does this, I shun them, not silence them. This is the essence of
free speech. To sacrifice this basic right, would be to invite obvious further
incursions into the state of liberty Americans so cherish.
-katykarter